It really wasn't as easy as I thought.
My first attempt was to wrap a small piece of paper around his finger, draw a line where the edge met the remainder, and measure.
You can see this is flawed for two reasons. First, I drew a different line every time I measured. Not exactly very accurate. Then, when I decided which measuring attempt was most accurate, I wrote 6mm on the paper because the site I was on was using mm as a measurement. Clearly, that isn't correct. No way is his ring finger only 6mm. It's 6cm, maybe, but why was the site using mm is beyond me.
I was more confused than anything, so I took a second approach. I went to the bedroom to grab one of Pete's rings.
I'm not sure if you can tell from the photo, but the ring is warped. It's an oval, not a circle. So while I was trying to hold it up to size charts on my computer screen, I couldn't get an accurate reading. Sure, it looked like it could be a size 9, but it also could be 9.5, or 10, or shoot, even an 11 seemed pretty okay.
So clearly, method two wasn't yielding accurate results.
I had to move on to method three: Google.
I looked online and found a printable ring sizer from Zales.
No comments:
Post a Comment